Intellectual Property Attorneys - IP Lawyers

Microsoft Sues Motorola for Patent Infringement

In the latest episode of software giant patent infringement lawsuits, Microsoft has sued Motorola over non-US made handheld phones.  Microsoft alleges that various Motorola phones, including the Droid 2, Droid X and Backflip, infringe seven of Microsoft's patents.  The patents in question relate to the android mobile operating system and involve methods for, among others, ActiveSync email synchronization patents. 

Considering that Google is set to acquire Motorola, this suit is the latest suit in the web of suits between Apple, Microsoft, Google, and other tech companies.  (Click here for a good graphic documenting these suits)  Based on the rash of litigation surrounding Android software, it appears that any company attempting to manufacture or sell android software is going to be involved in litigation.  However, Microsoft has already won a case against HTC and is currently receiving $5.00 per phone.  Thus, it is perceived that this suit is merely a negotiating tool for a similar licensing structure.  It is rumored that Microsoft is now looking for royalties between $7.00 and $12.00 per device. 

 Despite the outrage due to the large number of suits in the software patent arena, a majority of civil suits, regardless of the subject matter, are settled before they ever reach court.  If one of these software suits is able to reach the Federal Circuit, the Federal Circuit may be able to set down firm precedent to prevent future lawsuits.  Until then, however, these suits should not be reason for outrage, and can merely be viewed as negotiating chips, as they have yet to prove to be much more.  Microsoft has a large patent portfolio, a valuable business asset, and is using this asset just as any other asset is used, to generate a profit.

Leave a comment

Pages

Disclaimer

This blog and the information contained in this blog are provided for general informational purposes only, are not intended to be legal advice, should not be construed as legal advice, and do not provide specific legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this blog, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the blog without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state or jurisdiction who is familiar with the specific facts of your situation. If you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.