Intellectual Property Attorneys - IP Lawyers

The Wait is Finally Over: Bilski v. Kappos

The Supreme Court has finally released the much anticipated Bilski v. Kappos.  The machine or transformation test was upheld, but it is not the only test to determine if something is patentable under 101.  A look at the factors of Diehr, Benson and Flook is also required.  From SCOTUSblog, which covered the release of Bilski live:

Erin: 
The Federal Patent Act does not categorically exclude business methods from eligibility to be patented.
Erin: 

The word "method" within the law's definition of  "process" may include at least some methods of doing business.  Even though the invention in this case would not be categorically barred from eligibility, the Court says that does not mean it qualifies as a process.

 

We will have much more coverage of Bilski soon, but for now, here is the opinion:

Bilski.pdf

Leave a comment

Pages

Disclaimer

This blog and the information contained in this blog are provided for general informational purposes only, are not intended to be legal advice, should not be construed as legal advice, and do not provide specific legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this blog, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the blog without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state or jurisdiction who is familiar with the specific facts of your situation. If you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.