Intellectual Property Attorneys - IP Lawyers

Kappos on Reexaminations

David Kappos recently blogged about the importance of reexamination proceedings.  He acknowledges while there are plenty of "jobs locked up in [the] backlog," there are also "lots and lots of jobs riding on the patents we have in reexamination."

Reexamination proceedings grew every single year in the period from 2000-2004 and the period from 2006-2009.  This is in part due to numerous developments, including the Central Reexamination Unit and the decision in KSR v. Teleflex (lowering the standard for obviousness), which have made reexamination a more effective tool for challenging the validity or scope of patents or using it as a defense in an infringement case.

Kappos also provided a link to the "Best Practices" for reexamination.

Leave a comment

Pages

Disclaimer

This blog and the information contained in this blog are provided for general informational purposes only, are not intended to be legal advice, should not be construed as legal advice, and do not provide specific legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this blog, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the blog without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state or jurisdiction who is familiar with the specific facts of your situation. If you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.