Intellectual Property Attorneys - IP Lawyers

Amici oral arguments requested in Ex parte Bilski

The CAFC has requested oral arguments from two amici for its hearing of Ex parte Bilski: Regulatory Datacorp and the Financial Services Industry group.

 The RDC argues for a broad interpretation of patentable subject matter, interpreting the term "process" in 35 USC §101 to encompass any art, method, or process, that falls outside of the prohibited subject matter of abstract ideas, physical phenomena or laws of nature. FSI, on the other hand, interprets "process" narrowly, with a process being patentable subject matter only in cases where it results in a physical transformation, or is tied to a machine in a non-conventional manner. A "token" mention of a machine would not, therefore, render a mental process patentable.

The CAFC will hear Bilski en banc at 2:00 PM on May 8, 2008.

Leave a comment

Pages

Disclaimer

This blog and the information contained in this blog are provided for general informational purposes only, are not intended to be legal advice, should not be construed as legal advice, and do not provide specific legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this blog, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the blog without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state or jurisdiction who is familiar with the specific facts of your situation. If you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.