Timothy J. Maier

Partner of Maier & Maier, PLLC


Christopher J. Maier

Partner of Maier & Maier, PLLC




IP Dragon

Philip Brook's Patent
Infringement Updates

Patent Docs

Patent Pending

Chicago IP Litigation

Legal Fixation

Now, Why Didn't I Think Of That?

Patent Prospector

IPKat

The Counterfeit Blog

USPTO Examiners

« Federal Circuit confirms meaning of indefinite articles in patent claims | Main | Increase in East Asian patent filings outpaces rest of world »

Louis Vuitton may be banned from sale in China

Under Chinese Trademark Law, a trademark owner with products belonging to different classes under the Nice Classification must register its trademarks separately in each class. Wang Jun, an apparel dealer in Wuhan, had discovered that while Louis Vuitton had registered its trademarks
 for such products as apparel, leather products, jewelry and precious metals while leaving the product patent in China void and empty. Wang then successfully registered the trademark "LOUYIVEITEN" and, in late 2003, obtained a patent on a package design similar to that of LV's handbags.

In 2004, LV requested the Chinese State IP Office to invalidate Wang Jun's patents on the grounds that the pattern elements of Wang Jun's design are largely LV's world famous patterns; since LV had long ago registered its trademark in China, LV posited that Wang's patent was in conflict with LV's priority right. The Chinese IP Office ruled that LV did not provide sufficient evidence and refused to invalidate Wang's patents.

 Wang has offered to sell the patent to LV for US$17.5M or, alternatively, for a consideration of 1 yuan and the grant of an exclusive franchise in Wuhan. LV has refused to do so, and its future in the Chinese market is currently uncertain.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 

Subscribe












© Post Grant – a leading IP law Blog

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Designed by Scorpion Design